JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 24, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Sala De Seguimiento

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez
  • Competente hasta que esté completamente restablecido el derecho o eliminadas las causas de la amenaza
Seguimiento Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Desplazamiento Forzado
  • Solicitud de aclaración de la orden trigésimo quinta del auto 373/16 elevada por la Procuraduría General de la Nación
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

El Procurador General de la Nación solicitó a la Sala de Seguimiento de la Sentencia T-025/04, aclarar la orden trigésimo quinta del Auto 373/16, en lo concerniente al plazo allí establecido.

Tras concluir que la petición fue presentada de manera extemporánea, se declara su improcedencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. DECLARAR extemporanea e improcedente la solicitud de aclaracion de la orden trigesimo quinta del auto 373 de 2016 elevada por la Procuraduria General de la Nacion.
  2. SEGUNDO. REITERAR a la Procuraduria General de la Nacion el termino de dos (2) meses contados a partir la notificacion del auto 373 de 2016, para dar cumplimiento a la solicitud expuesta en la orden trigesimo quinta del mencionado auto.
  3. TERCERO. COMUNICAR a la Procuraduria General de la Nacion del presente auto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.